The board of Boulevard East, a new downtown Brooklyn condominium, is accusing the project's developer, Brooklyn Bridge Boulevard, of wrongfully taking out a $500,000 mortgage on the superintendent's apartment in the building, according to a recent lawsuit filed by the board, according to an article by Amanda Fung yesterday at crainsnewyork.com.
The legal action follows earlier accusations against the developer alleging structural defects in the 99-unit building, the article said.
According to the lawsuit filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Kings, the sponsor of Boulevard East received a mortgage from City & Suburban Federal Savings Bank for half a million dollars that was securitized against the building's superintendent's apartment in 2005.
The lawsuit says that the sponsor "committed fraud in obtaining said mortgage" and "that due to the fraud and breach of terms of the purchase agreement by the defendants, the purchase money note agreements between the defendant sponsor and plaintiff should be revoked and terminated." The condo board claims that they were unaware of this mortgage and that it was not taken in their best interest. The plaintiffs are seeking $570,000 in compensatory damages, the lawsuit said.
Additionally, proceeds of that mortgage went directly to the sponsor, not to the unit owners, even though the loan was securitized against the super's apartment, according to documents reviewed by Marc Held of law firm Lazarowitz & Manganillo, an attorney who represents the condo board in the suit.
Mario Procida, the sponsor of Boulevard East, acknowledged the mortgage, but said: "There was no fraud. Everything we have done is in accordance with the offering plan of the building." He also noted that the mortgage was taken out to help finance the sale of the super's unit to the condo board. "We are hopeful that this will get resolved."
"We are trying to come up with a plan to address the issues that are our responsibility, relative to the construction defects," said Mr. Procida, adding that he met with the plaintiff's engineer.
Mr. Held told crainsnewyork.com that the mortgage in question is now due and that is how the condo board learned of it and the article said that "if the sponsor doesn't pay for the mortgage, the bank could foreclose on the unit in the building." "Developers can't use projects as their personal piggy banks," said Mr. Held. "They must be held accountable for their ability to disclose this mortgage to people who purchase in this building and subsequent board members who took over Boulevard East."
The fraudulent loan claim is part of a broader lawsuit which accuses the sponsor of Boulevard East of construction defects, and the condo board is seeking $5 million in compensatory damages to pay for the repairs needed on the 11-story building, located at 53 Boerum Place, because of the faulty construction, according to the lawsuit.
The legal action follows earlier accusations against the developer alleging structural defects in the 99-unit building, the article said.
According to the lawsuit filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Kings, the sponsor of Boulevard East received a mortgage from City & Suburban Federal Savings Bank for half a million dollars that was securitized against the building's superintendent's apartment in 2005.
The lawsuit says that the sponsor "committed fraud in obtaining said mortgage" and "that due to the fraud and breach of terms of the purchase agreement by the defendants, the purchase money note agreements between the defendant sponsor and plaintiff should be revoked and terminated." The condo board claims that they were unaware of this mortgage and that it was not taken in their best interest. The plaintiffs are seeking $570,000 in compensatory damages, the lawsuit said.
Additionally, proceeds of that mortgage went directly to the sponsor, not to the unit owners, even though the loan was securitized against the super's apartment, according to documents reviewed by Marc Held of law firm Lazarowitz & Manganillo, an attorney who represents the condo board in the suit.
Mario Procida, the sponsor of Boulevard East, acknowledged the mortgage, but said: "There was no fraud. Everything we have done is in accordance with the offering plan of the building." He also noted that the mortgage was taken out to help finance the sale of the super's unit to the condo board. "We are hopeful that this will get resolved."
"We are trying to come up with a plan to address the issues that are our responsibility, relative to the construction defects," said Mr. Procida, adding that he met with the plaintiff's engineer.
Mr. Held told crainsnewyork.com that the mortgage in question is now due and that is how the condo board learned of it and the article said that "if the sponsor doesn't pay for the mortgage, the bank could foreclose on the unit in the building." "Developers can't use projects as their personal piggy banks," said Mr. Held. "They must be held accountable for their ability to disclose this mortgage to people who purchase in this building and subsequent board members who took over Boulevard East."
The fraudulent loan claim is part of a broader lawsuit which accuses the sponsor of Boulevard East of construction defects, and the condo board is seeking $5 million in compensatory damages to pay for the repairs needed on the 11-story building, located at 53 Boerum Place, because of the faulty construction, according to the lawsuit.
Architecture Critic
Carter Horsley
Since 1997, Carter B. Horsley has been the editorial director of CityRealty. He began his journalistic career at The New York Times in 1961 where he spent 26 years as a reporter specializing in real estate & architectural news. In 1987, he became the architecture critic and real estate editor of The New York Post.
6sqft delivers the latest on real estate, architecture, and design, straight from New York City.
