Skip to Content

27 East 65th Street: Review and Ratings

between Madison Avenue & Park Avenue View Full Building Profile

Carter Horsley
Review of 27 East 65th Street by Carter Horsley

This 17-story building had the distinction of being the only light blue-brick, high-rise, residential building in Manhattan.

Like much in the city, however, that distinction was short-lived for in the 2000s, the building changed the color of its brick façade to red.

The Museum Tower on West 53rd Street adjacent to the Museum of Modern Art has some blue glass on its façades, and the Mondrian on East 53rd Street also has some deep blue glass on its façades, and there are numerous pre-war buildings that have some blue in their terra-cotta decorative façade elements, but only this building was bold enough to experiment extensively with blue masonry above the first floor.

It was erected in 1963 and converted to a cooperative in 1984. It has 83 apartments.

The light blue color was not unattractive, and somewhat of a relief from the more commonplace white- and gray-brick buildings that proliferated in the late 1950's after the success of Manhattan House, the large white-brick, full-block residential complex between Third and Second Avenues and 65th and 66th Streets. White became popular because it signified modernity and because it "lightened" the urban palette. For about a generation, most new "luxury" residential high-rise construction in the city imitated Manhattan House's light-colored façades, although few matched its lush landscaping and extensive, transparent lobbies and strong massing. In time, such construction, which was generally devoid of pre-war detailing, fell out of favor because of its architectural blandness and the emerging popularity of Post-Modern designs, first, and new modern architecture, secondly.

There is no reason that urban architecture should not have a full palette of colors, but developers and lenders tend to be conservative and not surprisingly have concerns about the effect of exotic colors on their marketing. There are a few "dark" buildings and one might argue that a deep blue façade might be quite interesting. It could be argued that light-blue buildings "fade" into the sky, often, but a more important concern, especially in recent years with heightened interest in historic preservation, is the nature of the neighborhood context. Does a chosen façade color clash with or complement its neighbors?

A couple of white-brick apartment houses on the Upper East Side - 35 East 85th Street and 7 East 86th Street - opted to replace their façades with red bricks at the start of the millennium, an indication of disenchantment with such façades, part of which is also explained by the fact that many of the older "white" and "gray" brick façades had significant "spalling" problems in the city's freeze-thaw cycles that caused major façade maintenance problems.

This building has a prime Upper East Side location that is very convenient to the Midtown office district as well as the fashionable boutiques, restaurants, and art galleries on Madison Avenue. Central Park is only a block away to the east and because it is across from the low-rise Giorgio Armani store on Madison Avenue, this building has considerable "light and air" as well as many good views. The side-streets in this vicinity are among the finest in the city and a subway station is not far away at 67th Street and Lexington Avenue.

This building has a one-story, polished black granite base and a taxi lamp at the corner. It has a curved red canopy and high-end retail spaces. Ferrier, a restaurant, occupies part of its sidestreet frontage for several years but subsequently was replaced by Match.

The building has a garage, a doorman, discrete air-conditioners, sidewalk landscaping, consistent fenestration, and some terraces. There is considerable traffic on Madison Avenue and the building has no balconies.

A July 2, 2004 article in The New York Times reported that "After a two-year court battle, workers are moving ahead to strip the signature blue bricks off the façade of the co-op apartment house at 27 East 65th Street, at the corner of Madison Avenue."

"A panel of the Appellate Division of New York State Supreme Court ruled this month in favor of the co-op board in its long-running dispute with Elliott E. Sutton, 62, a real estate investor who controls the building's ground-floor commercial space as an equal partner with the co-op board."

"The ruling," the article continued, "cleared the way for the co-op board to get a $6.8 million mortgage that will refinance an existing loan and provide some $3 million to replace the blue bricks with ordinary red ones, according to Gil Feder, a lawyer for the firm Reed Smith, which represents the board. The wrangling began in early 2002, when city inspectors said the façade of the 17-story building, which was built in 1963, was in danger of crumbling and ordered a scaffold erected....Mr. Sutton worried that his ground-floor restaurant, Ferrier, and other tenants including a Citibank branch, would lose business the longer the project took and he argued for a quick job that would merely replace bad bricks in patchwork fashion. The two sides landed in court, and both the blue bricks and the scaffold stayed, and stayed and stayed. The co-op applied for a mortgage to finance the brickwork, but Mr. Sutton, as joint owner of the property, refused to sign the loan papers. After a series of arbitration and court decisions, a judge finally ruled that the co-op could sign on behalf of its unwilling partner. That decision was upheld by the appellate panel. Mr. Sutton, however, says he will ask the New York State Court of Appeals in Albany, the state's highest court, to take up the case. In a court hearing last January, Justice Jane S. Solomon of the State Supreme Court in Manhattan wondered aloud about the long-running feud. 'Does your client have an emotional connection to blue brick?' she asked one of Mr. Sutton's lawyers. The judge's question was repeated to Mr. Sutton last week. 'I don't care if it's blue, black, green or orange,' he said. 'I only own the ground floor. I don't look up.'

In 2009 the building underwent extensive renovations with a new roof and new elevators and the lobby was planned for renovation in 2010.

Rating

24
Out of 44

Architecture Rating: 24 / 44

+
23
Out of 36

Location Rating: 23 / 36

+
11
Out of 39

Features Rating: 11 / 39

=
58

CityRealty Rating Reference

 
Architecture
  • 30+ remarkable
  • 20-29 distinguished
  • 11-19 average
  • < 11 below average
 
Location
  • 27+ remarkable
  • 18-26 distinguished
  • 9-17 average
  • < 9 below average
 
Features
  • 22+ remarkable
  • 16-21 distinguished
  • 9-15 average
  • < 9 below average
 
Book a Tour or Get More Information on this Building
Interested in selling?
Key Details
Dahlia
between Amsterdam Avenue & Broadway
Broadway Corridor
Forward-thinking and elegant homes on the Upper West Side. 2-4 bedroom residences | Occupancy Q3 2020.
Learn More
Dahlia Building - Exterior Views Dahlia Building - Living Room Dahlia Building - Open Kitchen Dahlia Building - Courtyard Dahlia Building - Playroom Dahlia Building - Exterior Front View