A stack of bills awaiting Governor Kathy Hochul’s signature includes the “Fair and Transparent Real Estate Listings Act,” a measure that would make public marketing the default for residential sale and rental listings in New York State. The bill does not eliminate private listings outright, but it would require sellers and landlords to sign a standardized disclosure form before directing their agent to withhold a listing from public marketing.
In this article:
The debate should not be framed as a simple question of whether private listings are good or bad, says Briggs Elwell, CEO and co-founder of RLTYco, a platform that provides real estate professionals with knowledge, resources, and support. In Mr. Elwell’s view, the central issue is consumer choice. “Everyone has a right with their personal property,” he said, noting that some sellers have legitimate reasons to control how widely information about their home is distributed.
What are whisper listings?
The history of whisper listings
In 2019, the National Association of Realtors introduced its Clear Cooperation policy. The policy generally requires participating listing brokers to submit a property to the MLS within one business day of publicly marketing it. The goal was to prevent available homes from being fragmented across private channels and to preserve broader access to listing information.
↓ Park Avenue home now in contract after never being publicly listed
The pros and cons for consumers
Elwell points to celebrities, estate sales, and other sensitive situations as cases where off-market marketing may be more than a convenience. For a public figure, he noted, news that an apartment is being listed can invite speculation about career moves, personal circumstances, or finances. “Imagine if you heard a player from Knicks listed their apartment for sale, it would invite speculation that the person is being traded to another team.” In those cases, privacy may be part of the seller’s best interest, even if broader exposure could potentially produce a higher price.
This is the central consumer issue at the heart of the transparency debate. Since the rise of online listings, buyers have had unprecedented access to housing information. Whisper listings move some of that information back behind closed doors.
The pros and cons for agents and brokerages
In some cases, an off-market transaction may allow a listing agent, team, or brokerage to keep more control over the deal. If the buyer is found internally or through a limited network, the listing side may be more likely to capture both sides of the commission or keep the transaction within the same firm. For large brokerages with deep rosters of agents and clients, private listing networks can be a powerful business advantage.
Smaller and independent brokerages may see the issue differently. If large firms are able to keep more inventory inside their own systems, agents outside those networks may have fewer listings to show their buyers. That can affect competition not only among buyers, but also among brokers trying to serve them.
This helps explain why policies such as Clear Cooperation and laws like New York’s proposed Fair and Transparent Real Estate Listings Act are so divisive. Supporters see them as necessary safeguards for market access and fair competition. Opponents argue that sellers should have more freedom to decide how, when, and where their homes are marketed.
The Fair and Transparent Real Estate Listing Act
The bill’s stated purpose is to promote fair housing opportunity, market competition, and accurate price discovery. It is also aimed at reducing the use of private or limited-access listing channels that make some homes visible only to select brokers, buyers, or brokerage networks.
Importantly, the bill would not ban private marketing altogether. Sellers and landlords could still choose to keep a property off public platforms, but only after acknowledging the potential risks in writing.
Elwell questioned whether the proposed disclosure requirement would materially change seller behavior. He compared the opt-out form to a kind of “nutritional label” for private listings, designed to make the risks clearer rather than remove the option altogether. Sellers who truly need privacy, he said, are still likely to choose an off-market strategy after acknowledging that public exposure may bring more buyers and potentially a higher price.
Main points of the bill
- Public marketing would become the default. Listing agents would generally be required to publicly advertise or market residential properties for sale or lease on an MLS or another platform accessible to the public and to licensed agents representing buyers or tenants.
- Private and limited-access channels would be restricted. If a property is marketed through a private brokerage network or other restricted channel, it would also need to be marketed publicly at the same time unless the seller or landlord opts out.
- Sellers and landlords could still choose privacy. The bill preserves the option for non-public marketing, but only if the seller or landlord signs a standardized opt-out disclosure before or at the time of entering into the listing agreement.
- The opt-out form would explain the risks. The required disclosure would warn that withholding a listing from public marketing may reduce visibility, limit online exposure, lead to fewer offers, affect price or timing, and cannot be used in a discriminatory way.
- Agents would have recordkeeping obligations. Listing agents would need to keep the signed opt-out form for at least three years and make it available to the Department of State upon request.
- The Department of State would oversee implementation. The Department would issue rules and make the standardized disclosure form publicly available.
- Penalties could increase. The bill would raise the maximum fine for certain real estate licensee violations from $2,000 to $5,000.
- The law would not require open houses. Sellers and landlords would not be forced to hold open houses or allow showings that violate their rights under state or federal law, including health, safety, and security protections.
Less competition, more privacy, or less exposure?
But the larger question is whether a housing market works best when available properties are visible to everyone or when access depends on private networks. New York’s proposed transparency law comes down on the side of broader access, while still leaving room for sellers and landlords who knowingly choose a quieter path.
For consumers, public listings remain the clearest view of what is available on the market, while off-market opportunities may still play a role in certain circles.
In Plain Sight: Active NYC Listings with Upcoming Open Houses
241 West 108th Street, #4E
$525,000
Broadway Corridor | Cooperative | 1 Bedroom, 1 Bath | 450 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
Harridge House, #12M
$550,000
Midtown East | Cooperative | 1 Bedroom, 1 Bath
Open House: Sunday, June 14
Harridge House, #4M
$649,000
Midtown East | Cooperative | 1 Bedroom, 1 Bath | 800 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
The Ansonia, #850
$675,000 (-6.9%)
Broadway Corridor | Condominium | Studio, 1 Bath | 450 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
Carlton Regency South, #13C
$700,000
Murray Hill | Cooperative | 2 Bedrooms, 1 Bath
Open House: Sunday, June 14
200 East 36th Street, #8G
$749,000
Murray Hill | Cooperative | 1 Bedroom, 1 Bath | 850 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
Nevada Towers, #5A
$750,000
Lincoln Center | Cooperative | 1 Bedroom, 1 Bath
Open House: Sunday, June 14
432 West 52nd Street, #4C
$775,000
Midtown West | Condominium | 1 Bedroom, 1 Bath | 594 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
Lincoln Towers, #9J
$895,000
Lincoln Center | Cooperative | 2 Bedrooms, 1 Bath
Open House: Sunday, June 14
Riverview South, #16M
$999,000
Yorkville | Cooperative | 2 Bedrooms, 2 Baths | 1,250 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
684 Washington Street, #BA
$1,000,000
West Village | Cooperative | 1 Bedroom, 1 Bath | 819 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
422 13th Street, #4F
$1,095,000
Park Slope | Cooperative | 2 Bedrooms, 1 Bath
Open House: Sunday, June 14
194 Bainbridge Street, #505
$1,195,000
Bedford-Stuyvesant | Condominium | 2 Bedrooms, 2 Baths | 877 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
The Horizon, #21J
$1,350,000
Murray Hill | Condominium | 2 Bedrooms, 2 Baths | 1,085 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
Sutton 57, #5C
$1,595,000
Midtown East | Condominium | 2 Bedrooms, 2.5 Baths | 1,260 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
205 East 78th Street, #11L
$1,995,000
Lenox Hill | Cooperative | 2 Bedrooms, 2 Baths | 1,500 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
Jackson Foundry Lofts, #1E
$2,095,000
Williamsburg | Condominium | 1 Bedroom, 1.5 Baths | 1,132 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
Barbizon 63, #13A
$3,250,000
Lenox Hill | Condominium | 2 Bedrooms, 2.5 Baths | 1,770 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
Philip House, #11C
$3,950,000
Carnegie Hill | Condominium | 2 Bedrooms, 2 Baths | 1,790 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
133 West 22nd Street, #10D
$4,395,000
Chelsea | Condominium | 3 Bedrooms, 2.5 Baths | 1,999 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
838 Carroll Street, #TH
$18,500,000
Park Slope | Townhouse | 6+ Bedrooms, 6+ Baths | 8,200 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
The Plaza, #PH2003/09
$45,000,000
Midtown West | Condominium | 6+ Bedrooms, 6+ Baths | 10,290 ft2
Open House: Sunday, June 14
6sqft delivers the latest on real estate, architecture, and design, straight from New York City.